top of page

NEWS

Blogs

Search

Updated: Jul 30

When children first learn speech, they don’t start off learning grammar rules, but they still learn how to speak. When Japanese Violinist Dr. Shinichi Suzuki investigated this phenomenon, hoping to apply it to music, he discovered that children effortlessly learned their native language through listening, imitation, and immersion. Today, speech-language pathology and developmental neuroscience research have also come to a similar conclusion: repetition, rhythm, and recitation directly engage the neural pathways responsible for speech control and auditory processing.


Speech requires the brain to coordinate 100s of muscles for breathing, producing sound, and articulating the letters and words– all within 1 second.


When children practice repetitive speech, children slowly become fluent in their articulation, fluency, and memory.


Speech articulation relies on motor planning–the brain’s ability to organize muscle movement to create speech. To improve speech articulation, children need to practice speech in such a way that they only need to focus on articulation, which is where repetitive verses become important. Because children most likely have a repetitive verse memorized, they focus less on what to say and instead focus on how to articulate the verse smoothly. This technique relies on the neurological concept of “muscle memory”--or more formally known as speech motor automation. By repeating the same thing continuously, the brain builds automated neural pathways to help the mouth coordinate sounds more efficiently.



The Motor Theory of Speech Perception suggests that the brain breaks down speech by mimicking the mouths’ movements. When speech becomes rhythmic, following a beat or pattern, the brain maps the speech to the lips, tongue, and jaw movements to learn how to produce them. Doing this allows the brain to isolate and organize individual speech sounds better, creating the foundation for clear speech.



Speech requires controlled inhalation and exhaustion, especially in longer conversations. Rhythmic repetition acts like a metronome, helping children time their breaths in a way that least interferes with their speech. This is especially helpful for children who speak too fast or have speech irregularities, as rhythm encourages them to speak slower and smoother to maintain the rhythm.


While structured repetition can offer vital speech development for children, it’s critical to understand its benefits and the benefits of clinical therapeutic intervention.


Rhythmic recitation can build better speech control and auditory processing, but they can not treat speech disorders such as Childhood Apraxia of Speech, dysarthria, or significant speech delays. These require individualized assessments and clinically proven treatment plans created by Speech-Language Pathologists. Rhythmic recitation should never replace a Speech-Language Pathologist as it can never fix the underlying issues of speech disorders, whereas a Speech-Language Pathologist can.


Despite that, rhythmic recitation can be a vital tool for general speech improvement, and below are guidelines to maximize that benefit:


Incorporate kinesthetic cues. When words are paired with physical movement(clapping, marching, or tapping), it can strengthen how the brain understands speech rhythm.

Focus on the overall speech instead of a single mistake: Avoid interrupting a child when they are speaking to correct a singular mistake. Allow them to first finish the rhythmic phrase, then gently offer constructive feedback with specific examples on how to fix the mistake.

Increase the rhythmic phrase length systematically. Start with small, 2-line phrases before advancing to longer and more complex phrases. This will prevent children from being stressed and tired when speaking, especially since their muscles are still developing

Monitor for strain or fatigue. Speech should never be physically demanding to the muscles or the vocal cords. If a child shows signs of hoarseness or fatigue, pause the activity and allow the child to take a break until they feel better.


If a child consistently shows signs of speech problems well after the expected age of development, struggles to be understood by peers and adults, or shows signs of stress while speaking, schedule an evaluation with a certified Speech-Language Pathologist.


Repetitive recitation is far more than a simple childhood memory game. When utilizing rhythm, repetition, and supportive guidance, structured speech practice gives children the tools to explore their own voice–building clarity and confidence in their speech. As you explore rhythmic practice with your children at home, in schools, or in the community, remember that progress comes from consistent habits. By pairing rhythmic practice with professional guidance as needed, we can help every child find their voice.


 
 
 

Did you know that recent studies found that  AI-generated misinformation and disinformation could cost the global economy billions by undermining trust in markets and institutions? AI has the ability to create convincing arguments that are false. This is spreading misinformation rapidly across the internet. This technology can impact public trust, business decisions, political representation, and even global markets. AI misinformation can mislead people, influence opinions, and distort reality, making it harder to know what’s true. This threatens informed decision-making and can harm trust in media, institutions, and society. From the economic lens of AI misinformation, it can have serious financial consequences, affecting markets, businesses, and consumer behavior.

My research question is, “How can the use of generative AI impact the economy by spreading misinformation and disinformation?”. This question is important because AI has the ability to rapidly create and distribute false information. This can lead to economic instability, disrupted markets, and harmed businesses. All in all, affecting the global economy. First, it has the potential for AI to boost productivity and innovation. Second, the risks of AI spreading misinformation, which can disrupt industries and harm businesses economically. Lastly, the concerns about AI's ability to manipulate financial markets.

AI has the potential to revolutionize business operations by automating tasks and improving efficiency in areas such as customer service and software development. A report by McKinsey & Company, a leading global management consulting firm, indicates that generative AI could add between $2.6 trillion and $4.4 trillion annually to the global economy by enhancing productivity. “Generative AI can add $2.6 trillion to $4.4 trillion… the United Kingdom’s GDP in 2021 was $3.1 trillion. This would increase the impact of AI by 15-40 percent” (Mckinsey Digital 7). Given this information, we can conclude that generative AI has the potential to significantly boost the global economy. The estimated increase of $4.4 trillion annually suggests that businesses can use this technology to improve efficiency. This economic growth could lead to new job opportunities, which shows how generative AI is not just a technological advancement, but also a critical factor for future economic development. By understanding its potential, stakeholders can prepare for changes in the workforce and the overall economy.

AI can play a crucial role in transforming the workplace by automating routine tasks, allowing employees to focus on more complex and creative aspects of their jobs. According to a study by the World Economic Forum, a prominent organization known for its global economic research, automation and AI are expected to displace 85 million jobs globally by 2025 but also create 97 million new roles that require advanced skills. The study emphasizes that, “technology adoption will transform tasks, jobs, and skills by 2025, but this will also bring about challenges as job displacement could outpace job creation” (Zahidi 10). Given this information, we can conclude that while AI will automate many current job functions, there is also significant potential for new roles that demand human skills and creativity, necessitating workforce adaptation. This view compares to that of the second perspective in that it addresses job displacement risks, but also introduces the idea that AI will create new opportunities, contrasting with the second perspective's more pessimistic focus on economic consequences.

AI-generated misinformation can damage consumer confidence, leading to a ripple effect that negatively impacts market stability and economic growth. According to the U.S. News the rise of AI-driven misinformation has made it easier for misleading information to spread rapidly across platforms, which can cause stock prices to fluctuate unexpectedly. “ On May 20, an AI-generated picture depicted smoke from a government building near the Pentagon…false statements, particularly in cryptocurrency markets…temporarily affected market activity, and investors” (Ward 10). Due to this misinformation, we can see how easily investors can be influenced by what they see online. The AI-generated image created a sense of fear, leading people to react quickly and possibly make poor investment choices. This shows that when false information spreads, it can cause real harm to the market and hurt investors who are trying to make smart decisions.

The increasing prevalence of AI-generated misinformation not only distorts market perceptions, but also damages investor confidence, leading to more volatility in markets. According to a 2023 article by Forbes, a global media company focusing on business and technology, misinformation and disinformation generated by AI are increasingly being used to manipulate stock prices and influence trading decisions. Forbes states, "AI-driven disinformation has already impacted stock markets, leading to temporary price fluctuations and long-term damage to investor trust in the stability of financial institutions" (Reily, 7). Given this information, we can conclude that AI-generated misinformation presents a serious risk to market stability, as investors may act on false information, causing rapid shifts in market dynamics. This view compares to that of the first perspective regarding individual investor impacts but also emphasizes the broader consequences for institutional trust and long-term market performance.

AI has the potential to worsen socioeconomic inequalities by benefiting certain groups while leaving others behind. According to a study published in PNAS Nexus, a prestigious journal known for its interdisciplinary research, the authors, including leading economists and social scientists like Valerio Capraro, explain how generative AI can increase inequalities in various domains such as work, education, and healthcare. “Socioeconomic inequalities in three key areas: work, education, and healthcare…the benefits and costs (of AI) will likely be distributed unevenly…it also raises concerns about equal access to these advanced tools.” (Capraro 5). Given this information, we can conclude that the unequal distribution of benefits from generative AI will widen the existing gaps in socioeconomic status. The fact that larger firms and certain demographics may gain more from AI technologies means that those who are already disadvantaged could fall further behind. This highlights the need for policies that ensure equitable access to AI tools and resources, so that all individuals and businesses can benefit from advancements in technology, rather than just a select few.

The uneven distribution of AI's advantages raises significant concerns about its impact on vulnerable populations, particularly in how it can widen gaps in education and healthcare access. According to a report by the Brookings Institution, a nonprofit public policy organization known for its research on economic and social issues, "AI is poised to reinforce and even exacerbate inequality in areas such as education and healthcare, where access and quality are already unevenly distributed." The report emphasizes that without intentional policy interventions, "the benefits of AI will likely accrue to more affluent populations and regions, further entrenching disparities" (Graham 20). Given this information, we can conclude that while generative AI offers the potential to revolutionize industries, it also poses significant risks of deepening socioeconomic divides. The uneven distribution of its benefits, particularly in sectors like healthcare and education, underscores the urgent need for policies that ensure equal access and address these growing disparities. This view compares to that it acknowledges the potential of AI for innovation but stresses the importance of addressing inequalities to prevent further social fragmentation.

In conclusion, the discussion around the impact of generative AI on the economic impact shows the urgent need for new policies and equitable access to technology. Understanding both the pros and cons associated with AI is essential for ensuring that advancements contribute to a farrier society, rather than widening existing divides. One perspective emphasizes its potential to increase access and enhance productivity while the other highlights the risk of increasing existing inequalities. Despite their differences, both perspectives acknowledge the transformative nature of AI and stress the importance of implementing thoughtful policies to mitigate its adverse effects. I believe that AI is driving the spread of economic misinformation. This is because AI is still in its early stages and is prone to creating false narratives without realizing, as the author of the U.S. News article calls it, “AI Hallucinations”.


Works Cited

Capraro, Valerio, et al. “The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Socioeconomic Inequalities and Policy Making.” PNAS Nexus, vol. 3, no. 6, 31 May 2024, 

Graham, Carol. “Our Twin Crises of Despair and Misinformation.” Brookings, 22 July 2024, www.brookings.edu/articles/our-twin-crises-of-despair-and-misinformation/.

McKinsey & Company. “Economic Potential of Generative AI | McKinsey.” Www.mckinsey.com, 14 June 2023, 

Reilly, Meg Little. “Disinformation Is No. 1 Threat as Elections Approach, WEF Report Finds.” Forbes, 15 Jan. 2024, 

Ward, Scott. “Misinformation and the Stock Market: Will AI Raise the Risk to Investors?” U.S. News , U.S. News, 26 July 2024, 

Zahidi, Saadia. “See How the Future of Jobs Is Changing in the Age of AI.” World Economic Forum, 3 May 2023, 





 
 
 

The world we live in today is a canvas that has been filled with colors from ancient times to modernity. It’s the representation of all lives, memories, feelings, and experiences, shaping the world as we know it. We are defined by the past, from an individual level, a societal level, all the way to a global level, keeping us all cemented and connected together. However, in recent times, people want to erase or revise their memories. My stimulus excerpts, such as the Maori article and the article “My Mothers House”, emphasize that memories aren’t just nostalgia, but the bonds that connect us with our family and culture. This paper will argue that protecting our memories is important: it connects generations, decision making, and serves as a guidestone for future endeavors. In a time where memories can be changed with medicine, remembering the past serves not only as a way to honor ancestors, but also as a foundation to create a better future. 

Memories are vital for humans, as they shape our individuality and societies. They are the mechanism by which culture, traditions, and knowledge is preserved and shared. The past is vital to humans, as it defines and guides us. Some say that moving away and forgetting the past is necessary for progress, but others say that forgetting history prevents us from fixing our mistakes. It’s begun recently, with medicine used to “using drugs to manipulate memories”(gale). It’s been studied since 100 years ago, but medicine is coming now. It can be used to wash away memories, and causes people to forget themselves. It can also be used against people, since “If we're successful in doing these sorts of things, it will raise a societal debate about how far we want to go”(Gale). They say that revising or forgetting memories helps people move on from traumatic and painful experiences, but it comes with a great cost. It removes what makes us human, what makes us unique. Memories are the foundation of humans, as without them, societies, individuals, and cultures will be forgotten and will provide a weaker basis to prepare for the future. 

At its core, this paper aims to safeguard what defines who we are, our memories. First, memories bind generations together, providing a path for culture, values, and knowledge to pass from one generation to the next. Second, they serve as crucial tools for decision-making by giving background knowledge on what to do. Finally, maintaining an accurate historical record allows us to learn our success and weaknesses, so we can learn and prevent mistakes from happening again. Some may say that forgetting the past might be key to forging a new path, yet doing so risks severing the vital connections that have historically guided human progress. A society that discards its past is one adrift—unable to draw on the wisdom of previous generations to navigate future challenges. 

Memories should be preserved to connect with different generations, to help with our decision making, and to remember past societies. Memories are the backbone of a society; Each person builds on top of that tower, adding their own memories and experiences for others to learn and connect from. The Maori oral narratives, for example, stress that preserving history through “whakapapa” is essential not only for maintaining tradition but also for ensuring that cultural bonds remain intact (Binney 3). Whereas in Rachel Kaadzi Ghansah’s My Mother’s House, she explores the past when “my aunt made me promise that I would go across to Pineville and try to find my great-grandparents’ graves.” (Ghansah 16). Without memories, the bonds that connect generations will weaken, causing people to feel disconnected from their family and weaken the cultural foundation of society. People are a collection of all actions and experiences from the past. Knowing what defines us helps us know ourselves, and with that we can better connect with similar people. Especially in families where they share the same cultures and similar personalities, understanding those similarities ensures for a proper connection, from which families share knowledge, values, and get closer with each other. Some may argue that preserving these small cultures is insignificant due to its relevance, but it’s diversity that makes a society stronger. Preserving these memories is what unites a society in struggle and in victory, helping solve societal issues within the community and its people. In this way, memory preservation fosters social solidarity and reinforces cultural resilience.

A person cannot run without being able to walk first. Similarly, people can’t prepare for the future without knowing what happened. Research has indicated that negative memories remind people of their past errors and of circumstances they should avoid in the future”(Giorra). We make our decisions based on what we know, since we think that it might happen again. Due to our memories, we expect certain actions to have certain outcomes, since we might’ve experienced them ourselves or heard of them. These memories serve as a guidance telling us what and what not to do. But on the other hand, “recalling [memories and] its rare moments of satisfaction,then they may make predictions and plans accordingly” (Morewedge). We can also use our memories to know what actions are good, so we can repeatedly perform them. The brain stores these memories as a “model of a world”, constantly updating it with new details it remembers. Using that, the brain makes predictions of what will happen. As we continue to live, these predictions, weather right or wrong, get updated and changed to match our experiences.  This happens due to the mind, which is highly adaptable, has something to look at, and from their help we know and prepare for what may come in the future. Some may say that relying on the past too much prevents us from learning new things. While progress can’t be achieved by only sticking to the past, it doesn’t mean we should abandon it completely. A balanced approach–where memories and forward-thinking strategies are used–is when society can get real growth while strengthening the foundation of society, their memories. 

Looking at it from a scientific perspective, the brain is designed to retain past information and use it to imagine what might happen in the future. The brain often uses “episodic memory-a particular mode of future thinking that involves imagining specific personal scenarios.”(Bar). We don’t know what will happen in the future, but we know what has happened before. Our brain uses those details, what went right and wrong, and imagines something that could happen later on. These ideas help us figure out what we need to work on and be prepared for the future, especially since the future is always changing. The episodic memory is caused when “the past can come to mind uninvited, color the present, and push individuals into action; people can use their memories to guide their selection of goals and plans”(Kariniol). The past is what we base our thoughts on; it’s what gives the brain details on what and what not to do. With the details from the past, the brain can figure out how to deal with the same situation later on, since it can analyze what went well and what didn’t, and figure out how to fix that. Some critics may argue that memory may continuously change, it shouldn't be confused with complete revision or erasing our memories. It’s instead small changes in what we remember, and maintaining these memories with accuracy can give the mind a steady basis to retain the past. 

Given the challenge of maintaining the past, and the variety of angles needed to understand this problem, a comprehensive solution is required—one that integrates policy, education, and technology.    This solution should be implemented by policymakers and educators. They should take part of the documentation process, ensuring that the past isn’t being “revised” or written biased, and that it’s the truth. They could have a department that’s focussed on safeguarding past information to be used at a later point. They can play a part in recording information, processing it, and storing it, making sure that the “agency's ensure that the "real stuff" of history endures for future generations to see for themselves”(Ryan) according to the National Archives. Laws should also be passed that mandate transparency of historical data and ensure that revisions can’t be made to textbooks or documents. These textbooks should then be properly used by the schools, who emphasize on teaching the truth of what happened. They should discuss the variety of ways the past and memories can be viewed, ensuring that students have a strong understanding of what happened, keeping them prepared to tackle the future. Along with government archives, digital archives should be created to keep the memories of the past within easy reach of the public. These digital archives should be created to store large amounts of data and be created with security in mind, preventing others from changing facts of what happened. Collaborative initiatives between governments, academic institutions, and technology can help develop best practices for preserving the past. 

Although the past can be preserved, several limitations are to be considered first. A major concern is bias. Many historical narratives have already been tampered with in the past, and have caused many cultures and people to be marginalized since they didn’t fit into the narrative. Especially with history creating a ““apocalyptic vision, in its current form, problematises the space development inhabits”(Oceania), according to Gale in Context. This causes people to instead look down on cultures, as they are portrayed as evil or dangerous to the public. Another major concern is selective memory. Due to people’s memories adding new details everytime the past is remembered, it causes “those memories are notoriously unreliable”(Norberg 6). As new details accumulate in people’s minds as time goes on, it can cause people to completely forget what really happened, and instead causes them to believe in this fake memory as the truth. 



In a time period where culture and medicine face rapid changes, it’s more important than ever to safeguard our memories. The past isn’t just something that happened, it’s a guide where we can constantly learn new experiences, memories, decisions, etc to constantly shape and prepare us for the future. It’s vital for policymakers, educators, and cultural institutions to take the next step forward and protect the backbone of our identity and society. By protecting, teaching, and storing the past can we ensure that it remains safe and accessed by the public, serving as a connector and guide for life. As we move forward, we have to recognize that the past isn’t just something to be forgotten, it’s meant to guide us, meant to remind us of what we went through to get to this place. Only through protecting the past can we ensure that we’ll have this same guidance in the future. 

























Works Cited

Binney, Judith. Maori Oral Narratives, Pakeha Written Texts: Two Forms of Telling History.

Ghansah, Rachel Kaadzi. My Mother’s House.

Gioia, Dennis A., et al. “Revising the Past (While Thinking in the Future Perfect Tense).” Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 15, no. 6, Dec. 2002, pp. 622–34, https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810210449532. Accessed 9 Oct. 2019.

Karniol, Rachel, and Michael Ross. “THE MOTIVATIONAL IMPACT of TEMPORAL FOCUS: Thinking about the Future and the Past.” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 47, no. 1, Feb. 1996, pp. 593–620, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.593.

Morewedge, C. K., et al. “The Least Likely of Times: How Remembering the Past Biases Forecasts of the Future.” Psychological Science, vol. 16, no. 8, Aug. 2005, pp. 626–30, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01585.x.

My Mother’s House(By Rachel Kaadzi Ghansah)

Powell, Colin. Of Memory and Our Democracy.

“Preserving the Past, Keeping Pace with the Future.” National Archives, 15 Aug. 2016, www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2007/fall/preservation.html.

Schacter, Daniel L., et al. "Remembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain." Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 9, Sept. 2007, pp. 657+. Gale Academic OneFile, dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2213. Accessed 19 Feb. 2025.

Seligman, Martin E. P., et al. “Navigating into the Future or Driven by the Past.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 8, no. 2, 27 Feb. 2013, pp. 119–141, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612474317. 


 
 
 
bottom of page